• මුල් පිටුව
  • අප ගැන
    • අපි කවුරුන්ද?
    • අපගේ ක්‍රියාවලිය
    • අප කණ්ඩායම
  • ඇගයුම් ක්‍රියාවලිය
    • අපගේ ශ්‍රේණිගත කිරීම්
    • නිවැරදි කිරීම් පිළිබඳ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය
  • බ්ලොග් සටහන්
  • පෙර විශ්ලේෂණ
  • සම්බන්ධ වන්න
  • E සි த

Claim

Gamini Lakshman Peiris

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna

As long as 19A is in force, the president has to waste his time in courts… That is why immunity is needed…

Aruna: 8 Sep 2020

False

Statement

As long as 19A is in force, the president has to waste his time in courts… That is why immunity is needed…

Fact check

Minister Peiris misrepresents effect of 19A on presidential immunity

This statement was made in the context of the constitutional changes in the proposed 20th Amendment (20A). In his statement, Minister Peiris justifies the need for presidential immunity as provided for in the 20th Amendment, by claiming: As long as the 19th Amendment is in force, the president will have to waste his time (“rastify”) in courts.

To  evaluate this claim, FactCheck examined the provisions of Article 35 of  the Constitution as they stood before and after the 19th Amendment (19A).

A  plain reading of these provisions demonstrates that both before and  after 19A, no ordinary legal actions (whether civil or criminal in  nature) can be initiated or continued against the president while he  holds office. Therefore, legal actions in which the president was  personally involved (prior to election) stand suspended while he is  president.

The Constitution only permits limited legal challenges of the exercise of the president’s powers. Both before and after 19A, challenges of the president's actions are brought against the attorney general,  who appears in court on behalf of the president. The president was not  and is not required to personally appear in court (in fact, he is not  even a named respondent).

Pre-19A, only the exercise of the president’s ministerial powers could be challenged. Post-19A, the exercise of any of the president’s official powers (with one exception—his  power to declare war and peace) may be challenged by way of fundamental  rights petitions. While 19A widened the scope of actions which may be  challenged, it had no effect on presidential immunity in terms of  requiring the president to attend or spend time in court. Both pre-19A  and under 19A, he was never required to do so. This position remains the  same in that regard, in terms of the published 20A Bill.

Accordingly,  20A also makes no effective change to the president’s immunity in terms  of saving time spent in court. The only significant change is that the  scope of the president’s actions that may be challenged is narrowed to  the pre-19A position.

Therefore, we classify this statement as FALSE.

**FactCheck's  verdict is based on the most recent information that is publicly  accessible. As with every fact check, if new information becomes  available, FactCheck will revisit the assessment.

 

Additional Note 

The  minister further supported the need for immunity by stating, "The  president needs to be given the mental freedom to carry out the heavy  responsibility entrusted with him...” FactCheck did not evaluate this  claim, as the extent of mental burdens cannot fall within the scope of a  fact. However, it is possible that the minister perceived the increased  scope of presidential actions that may be challenged under 19A as  adding to the president’s mental burden.

Sources

Parliament of Sri Lanka, Second Republican Constitution of Sri Lanka incorporating its 19 Amendments, Article 35: available at: https://www.parliament.lk/files/pdf/constitution/constitution-upto-19th.pdf.

Parliament of Sri Lanka, Second Republican Constitution of Sri Lanka incorporating its 18 Amendments, Article 35: available at: https://www.parliament.lk/files/pdf/constitution/constitution-upto-18th.pdf.


Right of Reply

Leave a Comment.

0 Comments

විශේෂාංග ලිපි

  • වඩාත් කියවා ඇති ලිපි
  • නවතම ලිපි

FactCheck.lk පිළිබඳව ගම්මන්පිල මහතා දැක්වූ ප්‍රතිචාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අපි කණගාටු වෙමු

18 May 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk විශ්ලේෂණ වෙත ප්‍රතිචාර නොදක්වයි, FactCheck.lk වෙත ප්‍රසිද්ධියේ විවේචන එල්ල කරයි

30 May 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk expresses its disappointment with former MP Udaya Gammanpila’s statement

26 May 2020

Read More

திரு உதய கம்மன்பிலவின் அறிக்கை குறித்து FactCheck.lk தனது அதிருப்தியை தெரிவித்துக் கொள்கின்றது.

26 May 2020

Read More

Gammanpila does not respond to the analyses done by FactCheck.lk but criticises FactCheck.lk publicly

04 June 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk முன்னெடுத்த மதிப்பீடு குறித்து கம்மன்பில எந்தவித பதிலும் அளிக்காத போதும், FactCheck.lk குறித்து பொதுவெளியில் விமர்சிக்கின்றார்.

10 June 2020

Read More

Budget Check 2021

01 December 2020

Read More

Budget Check 2021

01 December 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk முன்னெடுத்த மதிப்பீடு குறித்து கம்மன்பில எந்தவித பதிலும் அளிக்காத போதும், FactCheck.lk குறித்து பொதுவெளியில் விமர்சிக்கின்றார்.

10 June 2020

Read More

Gammanpila does not respond to the analyses done by FactCheck.lk but criticises FactCheck.lk publicly

04 June 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk විශ්ලේෂණ වෙත ප්‍රතිචාර නොදක්වයි, FactCheck.lk වෙත ප්‍රසිද්ධියේ විවේචන එල්ල කරයි

30 May 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk expresses its disappointment with former MP Udaya Gammanpila’s statement

26 May 2020

Read More

திரு உதய கம்மன்பிலவின் அறிக்கை குறித்து FactCheck.lk தனது அதிருப்தியை தெரிவித்துக் கொள்கின்றது.

26 May 2020

Read More

FactCheck.lk පිළිබඳව ගම්මන්පිල මහතා දැක්වූ ප්‍රතිචාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අපි කණගාටු වෙමු

18 May 2020

Read More
අපි මීළඟට සොයා බැලිය යුත්තේ කුමන ප්‍රකාශයද?

Harin Fernando

The highest amount of debt repayment has to be done in 2021 and in 2022

Mahinda Rajapaksa

“The debt crisis created in this country by the Yahapalana Government has now reached a critical sta...

ඡන්දය ලබා දෙන්න

ප්‍රකාශය ඉදිරිපත් කරන්න

නිර්නාමිකව ඉදිරිපත් කරන්න
Hover Text
වැඩිදුර කියවන්න

පුවත් නිවේදන ලබාගැනීමට ලියාපදිංචි වන්න

අපගේ නවතම පුවත් පිළිබඳ සතිපතා නිවේදන ඔබේ විද්‍යුත් තැපෑල වෙත ගෙන්වා ගන්න.

Copyright © 2020

Web Design & Development by SABERION